|
Post by oswlek on Oct 26, 2012 9:48:18 GMT -5
I was nearly overwhelmed with all the options and opinions until I stumbled across as review that made a very salient point; that even the more expensive libraries have weak spots and most pros apply multiple VSTs, even layering them to get different player sounds. If I'm going to have to get it eventually anyway, I might as well pick it up as a cheap option to cut my teeth on. I wondering if anyone here has experience with it and if they know some tips/tricks or workarounds to get better sounds from the weaker samples. Bee, I know this isn't exactly within the parameters of the old HCSF, but I'm hoping we have some leeway with the smaller group here. If not, then delete with my apologies.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 9:52:56 GMT -5
I was thinking we should keep the rules the same... but we could have two forums... one for Songwriting, one for Engineering/Mix Critiques/Whatever else...
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 26, 2012 10:01:07 GMT -5
Two forums would work for me. Any more and it would just be too much, unless you expect people from all ends of the HC world to be coming over here.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 10:02:29 GMT -5
No, just us... I agree, too much would just dilute what we're trying to do here, but it may be nice to have an All Other Business forum where we can ask the questions we've never had a place to ask before...
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 26, 2012 10:06:41 GMT -5
Agreed. I always feel guilty about sending Stick or Lee mix questions (though it doesn't stop me! ) and the places on HC for those discussions just doesn't have the camaraderie or activity of our group. I wholly support and would contribute to a forum of that nature.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 10:12:01 GMT -5
Done!
|
|
|
Post by leeknight on Oct 26, 2012 10:15:07 GMT -5
Funny you should bring this up... but first, congrats on the library Oswey. Very cool. So, I'm reading a very very good songwriting book, with a horrible title. The Billboard Guide to Writing and Producing Song That Sell: How to Create Hits in Today's Music Industry. What a title. But a freaking great book. www.amazon.com/Billboard-Guide-Writing-Producing-Songs/dp/0823099547Anyway, there is one of those quotes where they bold it and make the typeface HUGE right in the body of text to make a punctuated point. And it says, paraphrasing: NEWSFLASH! A SONGWRITERS JOB DESCRIPTION HAS CHANGED! YOU’RE JUST NOT WRITING SONGS ANYMORE, YOU'RE ARRANGING THEM, YOU'RE PRODUCING THEM, YOU’RE RECORDING AND MIXING THEM. YOU HAVE TO DO IT ALL TODAY. And it's true. I get the reluctance of those that don't produce. That's fine, they know what they want to do, write. But as a job description? We have to do it all. There is no such thing as the guitar/voice demo. There is no such thing as the DEMO! They don’t' exist. Only to the writer do demos exist. To facilitate the writer only. But it does not leave the writer's possession anymore. Demos don't go out. Finished MASTERS go out. It a great point and it was fantastic to read it in black and white from a hit songwriter turned A & R guy. That is the world we live in today. With that in mind, I personally feel that the guys that don't want production blended in to some degree are not being realistic. That’s my take. EDIT: But this works great what you've done here!
|
|
|
Post by rsadasiv on Oct 26, 2012 11:04:42 GMT -5
I was nearly overwhelmed with all the options and opinions until I stumbled across as review that made a very salient point; that even the more expensive libraries have weak spots and most pros apply multiple VSTs, even layering them to get different player sounds. If I'm going to have to get it eventually anyway, I might as well pick it up as a cheap option to cut my teeth on. I wondering if anyone here has experience with it and if they know some tips/tricks or workarounds to get better sounds from the weaker samples. Bee, I know this isn't exactly within the parameters of the old HCSF, but I'm hoping we have some leeway with the smaller group here. If not, then delete with my apologies. I think I have a horn library from Miroslav (that I don't use very much). In the last few years I've made a conscious decision to cut down the number of instruments that I use, but before that I did spend a bunch of time with samplers and sample sets (mostly using Reason). So FWIW .... Sample libraries and samplers have gotten pretty good. Some of the free ones suck, but most anything you pay for these days has multiple velocity layers and reasonable ADSR envelopes. To me, the problem playing sampled instruments is not the samples but the player and the controller. The less percussive the instrument is, the higher the impedance mismatch (in the conceptual, not the electrical sense) between what you can control via midi events and what the physical instrument can express. And even more importantly, just because you can trigger a violin sample doesn't make you a violinist. You need to have some insight into the instrument itself, or least a clear idea of what you are trying to accomplish by using that instrument.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 11:24:06 GMT -5
Interestingly, you may remember a few months ago I was so excited because I finally ordered some midi cables. Well, I received them... tried hooking them up... and gave up on it. Just too much crap to understand and I get frustrated easily...
|
|
|
Post by rsadasiv on Oct 26, 2012 11:26:16 GMT -5
Interestingly, you may remember a few months ago I was so excited because I finally ordered some midi cables. Well, I received them... tried hooking them up... and gave up on it. Just too much crap to understand and I get frustrated easily... Forum needs a :facepalm: smiley....
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 11:27:48 GMT -5
Yeah... there seems to be no option to add more emoticons. You can always insert one as a picture.
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 26, 2012 11:28:10 GMT -5
The cables or challenging? I use this little number as an interface: www.ebay.com/ctg/M-Audio-Fast-Track-Pro-Digital-Recording-Interface-/70318770It has a midi input in the back, so I just run a cable from the keyboard to the interface. Done. Of course, opening up the midi programs in Cubase and running them are a little more complex than that, but connectivity is a non-issue. And I have no latency at all with the interface or the drivers, unless I mistakenly leave a finalizing plug-in enabled while recording.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 11:29:58 GMT -5
Hooking it up was easy... but figuring out how to assign the stuff... too much for my feeble brain. At one point, I could get the midi stuff sort of working, but then I couldn't play and record my keyboard with its internal sounds.
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 26, 2012 11:35:38 GMT -5
I think I have a horn library from Miroslav (that I don't use very much). In the last few years I've made a conscious decision to cut down the number of instruments that I use, but before that I did spend a bunch of time with samplers and sample sets (mostly using Reason). So FWIW .... Sample libraries and samplers have gotten pretty good. Some of the free ones suck, but most anything you pay for these days has multiple velocity layers and reasonable ADSR envelopes. To me, the problem playing sampled instruments is not the samples but the player and the controller. The less percussive the instrument is, the higher the impedance mismatch (in the conceptual, not the electrical sense) between what you can control via midi events and what the physical instrument can express. And even more importantly, just because you can trigger a violin sample doesn't make you a violinist. You need to have some insight into the instrument itself, or least a clear idea of what you are trying to accomplish by using that instrument. Yeah, I'm aware that you have to be careful to apply real world sense to the samples. I've done that in the past through automation, to make changes between notes sound more authentic. I agree with you that the samples are getting better, even in the free VSTs. That was something I battled with before making the purchase. Did I really need to spend money on this when some automation and reverb could make something free sound reasonable enough? But there is some convenience in having it all in the same VST and the functionality of it is very intriguing, being able to bundle multiple sounds together and set them to appear/change at various velocities...
|
|
|
Post by leeknight on Oct 26, 2012 12:07:45 GMT -5
I find that the most influential parameter for realism is the attack portion of the sample. Which one is being triggered via velocity. Me not being a real keyboardist, I tend to play it as expressive as I can but then go in and try the different velocities in the midi editing of my DAW. By rasiing or lowering one note's velocity, I peruse the effect of the different attacks samples. Then...
...I go in and edit obvious jumps in velocity if they sound funny. I'll add one sticking out if that makes the part more alive and realistic. Soemtimes I choose all and lower the whole performance if I like the way those sample layers sound better or more fitting for the part and song. Just looking and listening tells me a lot and lets me know how I can quickly (or not so quickly) edit velocity to up the realism factor.
And frankly, as hacky as I am, I tend to slam the keys and trigger inappropiatly hard sample. Harsh and biting cause they're the top of the dynamic. Backing that off smooths the whole deal and make sit sound a lot more realistc.
I just did it last night on Piano Lessons Down the Hall. An upright piano that at first sound pretty freaking midi, ended up sound a little more McCartney Upright after some tweaks.
|
|
blue2blue
New Member
The Bard of Bitterness, Denial & Regret
Posts: 43
|
Post by blue2blue on Oct 26, 2012 13:14:17 GMT -5
No, just us... I agree, too much would just dilute what we're trying to do here, but it may be nice to have an All Other Business forum where we can ask the questions we've never had a place to ask before... You could have a separate forum for critiques -- but one of the issues you get into when subdividing these fields of interest is that there is a legitimate and potentially fruitful cross-pollination between discussions of craft in general and critiques of specific songs. Also, I felt, over the years of watching the HC SWF that comingling non-centerpiece type content (FIT and Showcase threads, etc) with the critiques helped keep a certain vitality and interaction. People can get habituated to just going to the same forums of primary interest over and over. But sometimes it's the seemingly peripheral topics that help keep things interesting and info-genetically recombining. PS... one minor kvetch I have about this BB software -- after posting it just dumps you at the top of the thread. That is a very poorly conceived behavior I remember from some BB software from a decade ago. Otherwise, this software seems pretty OK as far as I've explored.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 26, 2012 13:21:59 GMT -5
No, just us... I agree, too much would just dilute what we're trying to do here, but it may be nice to have an All Other Business forum where we can ask the questions we've never had a place to ask before... You could have a separate forum for critiques -- but one of the issues you get into when subdividing these fields of interest is that there is a legitimate and potentially fruitful cross-pollination between discussions of craft in general and critiques of specific songs. Yes... I know if I have a song I'm working on, I'll contain my questions on both the writing and the production in a single thread. I'm thinking this other area will be good if you're truly only seeking production/mixing advice... or if you have some generally Off-Topic something you want to get off your chest. Of course, this will likely all go away once HC gets its head out of its ass. (And I just tried going over there again and got the ol' TCP Network Error. It really is a trainwreck... what are they thinking!?1?)
|
|
blue2blue
New Member
The Bard of Bitterness, Denial & Regret
Posts: 43
|
Post by blue2blue on Oct 26, 2012 13:30:48 GMT -5
Blame it on Bain.
A fish rots from the head, as the Chinese say.
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 26, 2012 13:34:38 GMT -5
I personally don't think this forum is going to be short-lived at all, assuming Bee is willing to keep it running.
As for the cross-pollination, when I click on "new topics" at the top of the page, I get all the threads in both forums, so that is good enough for me. Other people can filter out what they want to see and those of us who want it bundled are one click away.
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 27, 2012 7:42:24 GMT -5
FUCK!
It's not installing.
Dammit!
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 27, 2012 11:24:35 GMT -5
Hate when that happens.
|
|
|
Post by leeknight on Oct 27, 2012 17:32:32 GMT -5
J... I hope your install is going better.
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 27, 2012 22:35:43 GMT -5
Thanks, it is getting there. I've finally got the thing able to read its samples, but it doesn't consistently provide any audio when recording or on playback. The midi file that records plays fine when copied onto another VST instrument but I just get silence when playing the MP track.
Thankfully, that issue seems to be going away on its own...
|
|
|
Post by oswlek on Oct 30, 2012 12:03:13 GMT -5
Everything seems to be working, finally. It is pretty damn cool, though I'm not the best at hearing the differences between midi samples. I love all the combinations of things they have preloaded, it makes finding a group of cool sounding instruments easy to find.
IKmulti-media needs to get their act together, though. The process was very difficult and it fuddled up all their prior software I had installed, forcing me to redo a few other programs as well.
|
|
|
Post by leeknight on Oct 31, 2012 8:53:08 GMT -5
IK's system is butt. Hate it. I've got a few hundred bucks in Sample Tank and I don't even use it now because of the crazy install, rights issues, and lame app/sample onginization. Not to say your experience will be bad with your new purchase. I've heard good things... but I get your frustration.
|
|
|
Post by rsadasiv on Oct 31, 2012 9:01:00 GMT -5
IK's system is butt. Hate it. I've got a few hundred bucks in Sample Tank and I don't even use it now because of the crazy install, rights issues, and lame app/sample onginization. Not to say your experience will be bad with your new purchase. I've heard good things... but I get your frustration. +1. Not an IK fan.
|
|