|
Post by shadowsofbirds on Oct 27, 2012 1:33:06 GMT -5
I just tried to post this and it was swallowed (apparently by an angry bear) so forgive me if this is a bit short - A longish but interesting essay on Muzak/Background Music as differentiated from "Pure Music". media.hyperreal.org/zines/est/articles/muzak.htmlI didn't have a point or question regarding it - I just thought it was interesting.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 27, 2012 5:36:14 GMT -5
Mod Powers... Activate!!!!
You get why I moved it, right?
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 27, 2012 5:51:11 GMT -5
I'd hate to be a Muzak writer...
-"Hey... Check out my new song..." - "Yeah man... Cool... I don't remember anything about it but I felt relaxed and efficient".
|
|
|
Post by shadowsofbirds on Oct 27, 2012 14:14:09 GMT -5
I get why you moved it now. ..though If the other board is strictly for works in progress, why is the friday influences thread there?
The thing that interested me and what I typed before the angry bear swallowed it - I feel like Pop music (or songs) are squarely between two extremes..
Muzak/background music something intentionally not meant to be noticed.
"Pure Music" being symphonic/orchestral/classical music where active listening and sometimes knowledge is a part of the process of listening.
Pop music is meant to be as accessible noticeable and easy to listen to as possible.
In writing any song or piece of music their's a balance between the expected and unexpected or boring and interesting. That can mean resolving dissonances, making sure two simultaneous musical ideas aren't equally interesting (and so competing for attention), or repetition vs change/development.. or as all of us know - the balance between self expression and giving the listener what the listener expects. (for instance the guitar is standard in most forms of pop music - by excluding it you're distancing yourself from the listener in a subtle and sometimes not so subtle way.)
I thought the film editing analogy was particularly interesting and worth thinking about in our every day work. "How visible do I want this musical idea to be?"
I was just listening to an interview with Andy and Lana Wachowski and they were talking about The Matrix movies and how something they were surprised that few if any critics brought up was that the film itself was a Matrix of sorts. You plug in and it controls your thoughts and essentially shapes your world for two hours.
Again, I don't have a point per say - I just thought it was interesting.
|
|
|
Post by bee3 on Oct 27, 2012 14:30:06 GMT -5
I get why you moved it now. ..though If the other board is strictly for works in progress, why is the friday influences thread there? It's a valid point... One that I struggled with for about 30 seconds last night. I left it there because it is such a staple in the other forum... but I'm happy to move it if others feel I should.
|
|
|
Post by shadowsofbirds on Oct 27, 2012 15:15:00 GMT -5
;D
|
|
blue2blue
New Member
The Bard of Bitterness, Denial & Regret
Posts: 43
|
Post by blue2blue on Oct 27, 2012 19:52:44 GMT -5
Muzak is music as commodity. It's like people who buy books by the linear foot. It's a product designed to fill silences that might otherwise provoke someone to think. Pop music, on the other hand, has evolved for the specific purpose of ingratiating itself with the listener as fast as possible. Each song is like a little advertisement for itself, a bit like those male creatures in the animal kingdom that are all ornamentation and sex organ and little else. Back to easy-listening/muzak, I think I observed in the HC forum recently that I found it to be a lot harder to do convincingly than I thought it would be. I probably should have just stuck to keyboards and sequenced everything in but somehow I conned myself into building my easy listening debut around a guitar solo. Lesson: discipline and pragmatism trump adventurism and ego when creating purpose-built music like easy listening or promo/program music for business presentations, etc.
|
|
|
Post by oldgitplayer on Oct 27, 2012 19:57:19 GMT -5
Each song is like a little advertisement for itself, a bit like those male creatures in the animal kingdom that are all ornamentation and sex organ and little else. ;D
|
|
|
Post by shadowsofbirds on Oct 27, 2012 22:03:38 GMT -5
Muzak is music as commodity. It's like people who buy books by the linear foot. It's a product designed to fill silences that might otherwise provoke someone to think. Pop music, on the other hand, has evolved for the specific purpose of ingratiating itself with the listener as fast as possible. Each song is like a little advertisement for itself, a bit like those male creatures in the animal kingdom that are all ornamentation and sex organ and little else. Back to easy-listening/muzak, I think I observed in the HC forum recently that I found it to be a lot harder to do convincingly than I thought it would be. I probably should have just stuck to keyboards and sequenced everything in but somehow I conned myself into building my easy listening debut around a guitar solo. Lesson: discipline and pragmatism trump adventurism and ego when creating purpose-built music like easy listening or promo/program music for business presentations, etc. Did you read the essay linked? I don't mean that to sound contentious, it's just that your comment seems to ignore it and I was wondering if that's in objection to it, or because you weren't aware of the content. o.O
|
|